Today I sat back while writing my essay and wondered yet again. My kids did badly in the tournament. I’ve told them that the results don’t matter and that it’s a learning process. And yet, I wonder if the results do matter and whether I’ve actually done my best in helping them in the learning process.
I didn’t see them fall in love with debating as I did and maybe in that respect, I’ve failed as a coach. I’ve failed to impart in them a love that I myself have, much like a teacher who wishes that he managed to teach in such a way that made his students fall in love with the subject.
I love coaching but I can’t cope. I can’t cope with the time, the energy, but most of all the part of me that I invest in coaching. Everytime I do something that I love, whether it be writing, debating, coaching or simply loving, I invest part of myself in it. I don’t feel any smaller or less for doing so. In fact, I realise that the returns are so great. I love coaching but I’m just getting tired.
I find even more satisfaction when I can teach one of my kids to deliver an argument well, when I hear a well rebutted point or a brilliant response to a POI, perhaps even more than if I were to deliver it myself. I don’t think that I’m living vicariously through my kids (as creepy as that sounds), I just desperately want them to do well. I want them to believe in themselves, after so long of being told that they can’t make it. I want them to believe that they are better than their previous coaches told them.
But at the end of this run, it just feels like I got nowhere. I’m told that I’m a good coach, but what is a good coach if there is no results to show for it or even the feeling that your kids now love debating?
Nothing I guess.
2 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 13, 2009 at 1:42 am
~autolycus
Well, OK, let’s try to be objective… :)
1. A coach does one of four things.
a) She helps people become like her in principle or in role (mentor);
b) she helps people become the best that they can be given their talents and limitations (optimizer);
c) she helps people do something that meets an external standard (taskmaster);
d) she helps people learn to figure things out for themselves (guru).
2. There are four possible coach-pupil matches.
a) Bad coach, bad pupil (ha, sucks all round).
b) Bad coach, good pupil (ha, undeserved success).
c) Good coach, bad pupil (ha, undeserved self-chastisement).
d) Good coach, good pupil (ha, hard to tell who succeeded more).
There are 32 possible outcomes in this simple model. Choose one kind of coach, decide good/bad coach/pupil, decide overall success/failure. That’s 4 x 2 x 2 x 2 possibilities.
So, objectively, what kind of coach were you really? I have a personal opinion about you though. One day we’ll have lunch?
April 13, 2009 at 1:50 am
xin ling
hi becca.. i think you’ve done your best, so here’s a smiley(s) :) :D :] to cheer you up!!!